Anti Vaccine ≠ Anti-science
"Oh, you're anti-vaccine you must be anti-science." Actually no, I am "pro" informed consent. Which can look like anti-science to someone who doesn't know any better. Bless your heart.
This is probably the claim that irritates me the most. Of course, I don’t consider myself “anti-science” simply because I question the safety of vaccination and the implications they have on the only life I (and my children) have to live.
From what I have gathered the people who are making claims of “anti-science” haven’t actually read the science. At least not the science that I have been exposed to. The science I sought out to investigate personally so that I could be in charge of the information I was receiving not allowing it to be spoon-fed to me by the powers that be. On top of that, it is pretty clear that “science” can be bought and paid for, manipulated, denied, and covered up. Case in point.
Since you want some scientists here is a group of them. These scientists allege that the efficacy tests for the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine (MMR) were faked. The document was unsealed in June 2012. This is a major federal case alleging fraud in vaccine testing; it encapsulates how medical research can be manipulated to achieve desired results, and why it may be wise to question the integrity and the validity of “science-based medicine.”
See also Worshiping At The Alter Of Science
It seems to be common knowledge that in the last 30 years these vaccination schedules and these health situations have been simultaneously mounting. Our population seems to be more sick, prone, and allergic than ever before. With Dr.s now going digital, and detailed records being kept, there is some way to compare the medical records of vaccinated vs unvaccinated or even under-vaccinated children.
I can't help but wonder if the recent push to overly diagnose autism is an attempt at muddying the waters for just that reason.
A careful review of ASD cases discloses a number of events that adhere to an immunoexcitotoxic mechanism. This mechanism explains the link between excessive vaccination, use of aluminum and ethylmercury as vaccine adjuvants, food allergies, gut dysbiosis, and abnormal formation of the developing brain.
What the science has shown us is blatantly clear to me.
Vaccines have spread animal viruses to humans
which are now being linked to an assortment of rare cancers some 30 after they were declared harmless .
A large-series of serious autoimmune conditions have been reported. Is that science enough for the naysayers?
Surely it isn't. And I am short on time...
So I ask them.
Where is the science on safety? Where are the ACTUAL safety studies proving the ingredients contained in vaccines are safe? There aren't any. This is a global experiment. The “I have been vaccinated and I am fine” argument, isn’t even an argument at all - and no one knows they are even “fine”. This simply means they were guinea pigged at some point and now believe they are "fine" in spite of not actually knowing.
Never before has this schedule of vaccines been rolled out on the masses and we have no idea what it is doing to us now, let alone generations from now. I think all of the sick people everywhere with chronic conditions, autoimmune disorders, allergies, asthma, rare cancers, and autism is a good sign of where we are headed, though. And, I am not the only one.
I have done my best to use nothing but documented PubMed scientific studies throughout this entire process, and when you actually look at the details of the “science” it is pretty clear and shocking what the science actually says. I encourage individuals to seek out the science themselves so they can make the best most informed decision.
Don't fall for the anti-science rhetoric. Don't fall for the "My scientists are trustworthy and yours are quacks" crap. Bias is everywhere. The potential for vaccines to harm humans can be seen throughout history and in real-time data on VAERS. Of course, they have the potential to harm and there is no proof they are safe. Where is the science when you need it?
